Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Gallimore's Fine Restaurant
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Anger over women-only shortlists

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 November 2009
There was anger and dismay today after the Labour Party forced women-only shortlists on both the Wigan and Makerfield seats.
Against the majority of local members' wishes, a selection panel from the National Executive Committee insisted that positive discrimination was the way forward in the neighbouring constituencies.

Trouble flared soon after both Neil Turner and Ian
McCartney announced that they would be leaving Parliament at the general election and all-female lists were proposed.

With both constituencies claiming they had decent potential candidates of both sexes and objecting against the discrimination in principle, they lodged an appeal.

But that bid has now been rejected and while many local politicians have avoided speaking out for diplomacy's sake, many are said to be privately seething.

One Wigan party member who declined to be named said: "This is scandalous, sexist and a big blow to democracy.

"We should be able to pick from all the available candidates purely on merit, not restrict ourselves because of their gender."

There was also puzzlement that the NEC had insisted on all-women lists in Wigan, Makerfield and several other constituencies, but had allowed open lists in Warrington South and Derby North.

A Makerfield Labour Party member said: "We can understand the need to increase the number of female MPs, but why have two all female lists in constituencies next door to each other while others are given a free hand?"

But a Labour Party spokesman would only say: "The NEC selections panel looked at each constituency on a case by case basis and it was decided that Makerfield and Wigan would select candidates from all women shortlists."

Neither Mr Turner nor Mr McCartney could be contacted while Wigan Council leader Lord Smith declined to comment saying that he was a member of Leigh Labour Party and that the all-women lists were an issue for Wigan and Makerfield.

More on this story in today's (Wednesday) Wigan Evening Post ... on sale now



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 November 2009 9:13 AM
  • Source: Wigan Evening Post
  • Location: Wigan
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

,

25/11/2009 09:43:04
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

Lomra Greener,

25/11/2009 09:59:52
leviticus,

The criteria you state only apply if they are also single parents.

This is blatant sexism. Male only shortlists would not be allowed. Maggie had it right, 'the best man for the job regardless of sex'.

Hopefully, this may stir dyed in the wool labour voters to change the location of their crosses on polling day. I doubt it though.
3

Lomra Greener,

25/11/2009 10:13:53
Oh dear, the lobotomised one is back!, deleting legitimate posts and spouting socialist drivel yet again.

I said that if men only shortlists had been proposed, then there would have been a massive outcry of 'sexist!'.

I also said that maggie had it right when she said, 'the best man for the job regardless of sex.
4

FrankBill,

25/11/2009 10:15:53
'Positive' discrimination is still discrimination, imagine the uproar if it was announced that only male candidates were being considered? Surely the sufragette movement fought to gain the vote to be treated EQUALLY, now we find that their struggles are being belittled by do-gooders implying that women need a helping hand in order to succeed. If a candidate is good enough they should be selected regadless of sex, or any other physical attribute.
5

Lomra Greener,

25/11/2009 10:21:14
wwb, I have told you before. I work from home.

I cannot see why you have to be here though, do you not work?
6

celedrialjoy,

wigan 25/11/2009 10:30:42
Hang on a moment, I did not get to read the above comments before they were deleted, But I also do not agree with an all female candidate list, If a person is good enough then their gender should have no say in it at all. There are already women in positions of power at Wigan and I am sorry but they are hardly shining examples of dmocracy, Nodding dogs comes to mind.
Oops does that mean I am sexist! sorry female here, how would that work in a court of law? the point being if someone is good enough then they would stand up to scrutiny NOT ringfenced and protected. As a woman I find it an insult that my gender needs protecting.
7

johneeee,

pemberton 25/11/2009 10:33:42
so long as it doesn't interfere with the washing up and ironing then I don't see a problem with women doing more work
8

celedrialjoy,

wigan 25/11/2009 10:36:09
See there you go I am now going to have to stand for the council, never thought about getting out of the washing and ironing before, Oh bother my head wont nod the correct way.
9

celedrialjoy,

wigan 25/11/2009 10:47:46
WWB;
I understand where you are coming from, But I work also in a male dominated job, more so than the council, and to be honest I had to fight my corner in being allowed to take on the same work that the men do, not because they were being nasty to me but because they were trying to protect me, The point being I volunteered to do the job I do and if I am not up to it then I should not be there. The women who are being put forward are no more than political puppets who most likely will toe the party line just like the men, but even as puppets they are being given an unfair advantage. I await someone who will stand up to the "masters" regardless of sex.
10

celedrialjoy,

wigan 25/11/2009 10:55:20
That WWB is the question of the century, Whoever get in we would have to look higher up the chain of command to see who really will make the decisions, the rest are just decoration.
As for the deletions, well they are just a fact of life someone on a power kick.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.