Wigan borough Tory MPs vote against Government’s flagship Rwanda plan
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Chris Green (Bolton West & Atherton) and James Grundy (Leigh) voted for two amendments that right-wing MPs claim will help to protect the Government’s flagship asylum policy from legal challenge.
They joined more than 50 other Tory MPs who backed amendments tabled by former immigration minister Robert Jenrick and veteran Tory Sir Bill Cash - however both amendments were categorically defeated in the Commons.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad

Some 68 MPs, including 60 Tories, voted in favour of changes to the Safety of Rwanda Bill put forward by Conservative backbencher Sir Bill, which seek to ensure UK and international law cannot be used to block a person being removed to Rwanda.
The amendment was rejected by a majority of 461, but the rebellion gives an indication of the scale of unease within the Conservative Party during an election year.
The scope of the rebellion would be more than enough to sink the Bill and overturn the Government’s working majority of 54 if it were repeated at its final Commons hurdle – third reading – which is expected today (Wednesday).
However, no Conservatives voted against the legislation at second reading – despite similar warnings from the right of the party which had appeared to put its fate in jeopardy beforehand.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdFormer prime minister Liz Truss, former ministers Suella Braverman and Sir Simon Clarke and former leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith were also among those to back the amendments.
Mr Jenrick had aimed to change the Bill to severely limit individual asylum seekers’ ability to appeal against being put on a flight to Kigali.
The Commons later rejected his amendment 525 to 58, majority 467.
Under the Government’s plan, migrants who cross the English Channel on small boats could be sent on a one-way trip to Rwanda rather than being allowed to try to seek asylum in the UK.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe legislation along with a recently signed treaty with Kigali are aimed at ensuring the scheme is legally watertight following a Supreme Court ruling against it last year.
The stalled policy comes with a £290m bill but no asylum seekers arriving via unauthorised routes have been relocated as yet following a series of challenges in the courts.